Scientist Reveals Her Role in Human Enslavement and the ET Takeover
Hi! It’s Ileana. Today I am going to be talking about Area 51, specifically S1. This is the bioengineering facility in one of the first sections when you go down underground to the underground base facilities themselves.
So, what’s on top of Area 51—the military hangars, the buildings—those are just surface-level buildings where there are things that are normal. The things that are experimental—the things that are UFO crafts being reverse-engineered, ancient AI technology being studied, creating human-ET hybrids with grey DNA, the regeneration tanks, the plasma-like fluid that heals things—that’s what I had seen in S1.
And they’re doing a lot of DNA experiments. They’re mixing human DNA with ET DNA, studying it, and they’re growing hybrids in what I can only say is most like a vat system and a regeneration tank. And you’re seeing how the beings are grown, from gestation to fully grown. And it takes time for them to go through the maturation process and develop. And then, once they’re fully grown, I’m assuming somehow a soul steps into the body vessel.
(2:00) When a clone is being created, the body grown, what can happen is, they might not have an original soul coming to the vessel of the clone. They might get a little disk, very small disk implant that has the vibrational frequency with somebody else’s memories and experiences, and that’s implanted at the back of the head or the neck, and it integrates with the cranial brain capacity, that little disk implant. And it’s nanotechnology and crystalline technology, and it literally is the soul-vibration that this clone will carry. It is not an original soul, but it is an implant of a soul frequency, because not all clones get a new soul walking into the clone body.
(3:00) Sometimes what happens is, frequency-wise, there is technology with frequency, vibration, that can entrap a soul to come into a clone body. But usually, the clone receives this little disk insertion, dermal implant, through the skin to the back of the head or the neck. And it has memories and experiences, traits and characteristics of somebody that had been alive at one point—or is still alive—and their life experience information and memories have been copied from them to put into this clone body that’s grown and maturated at Area 51 in the S1 facilities. So, again, the clone does not necessarily have to have a fresh soul walk into it, or call in a soul to come inside of it.
(4:00) Sometimes beings who can do soul-transferrence, who can do soul-walking, will, on purpose, grow cloned bodies to put their soul frequency and their soul essence—or part of it—inside that cloned body to operate it. But that is done knowingly and on purpose through planning, [in order] to step into a cloned vessel, out of your own body, to step into the cloned vessel with your soul intact going in there. Then, when you’re done with the clone, [you] transfer your own soul-consciousness back into your original body, and then put the clone back into stasis. Some extraterrestrials can do that. These are called clone containers. They make them for themselves, humanoid cloned bodies, that they can transfer into and come to Earth and do whatever they’re doing [without detection]. So, cloned bodies can be used that way as well, with soul consciousness and soul transfer through the EMF devices.
(5:30) So, it can happen that way as well. That’s not the case at Area 51, though. They’re using those nanotech disks, [which] store memories and experiences of other people, to put in the clone, to power the clone. And the clone won’t know that it’s somebody else. The clone will think it’s that person, unless it’s given other memories that are protonic inserts that are put on that disk. Because the disk can be reprogrammed, and more things—memories, traits, characteristics—can be added to it along with that programming of what the clone is supposed to do. The clone is programmed. That’s what they figured out how to do at Area 51 with the maturated cloned bodies of the human-ET hybrids, the genetic imprint that they have on that clone.
(6:30) The extraterrestrials themselves who create those cloned body vessels, they might not look humanoid at all. So they create these humanoid-looking clone body-vessels that they can transfer their soul-consciousness into temporarily. It’s to look humanoid, to fit in. It’s so that these non-human extraterrestrials can blend in with a human culture to carry out their missions undetected.
(9:15) And these humanoid-ET hybrids are then transferred into a circular saucer craft and taken away for training to integrate with the humans on the surface of the planet. That’s what they were doing in S1 where I had been taken.
And I had been beamed out from my bedroom by a light stream, and I ended up on a teleportation platform pad that looked silverish-blue, and I was given a white jumpsuit uniform. I prefer blue, so I didn’t get a choice of clothing—I was given a white uniform jumpsuit. And then I was taken through a large elevator down underground into S1. So, the facility, the jump pads, it’s in one of the main facilities on the surface, where the jumproom pads are, the teleportation pads, but then you take an elevator deep underground.
(10:30) And I was taken to S1 to do these DNA experiments, to mix human DNA with extraterrestrial DNA, to grow those hybrids in the regeneration tanks. I remember this vividly because this happened in 2015. And then, when I would be finished with one of the projects, there are lights; there are these bright lights, white lights, above every working station that a person is sitting at. And the walls are sort of silver-blue—almost metallic—in S1. And these lights start humming and vibrating, and they erase whatever you were working on, your memories of whatever genetic project you were working on. They erase that from your memory, so you don’t remember much of anything, what you did. And then you’re taken home; you’re beamed back home. And then when they want you to work on a different project, they beam you in again, get you to do the work, erase your memories with these beams of light, from these lights, and beam you back home through this beaming technology that they have. That’s what I remember.
(12:15) And eventually I started having memory flashbacks from these events.
(13:00) There are about 6 to 8 sections: S1, S2, S3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and it goes down even deeper, where the generators systems are that power the underground sections.
I have remote-viewed Area 51 as well, just to see beyond S1, and S4 actually is connected with tunnel systems to another facility. So, a small portion of S4, where they test the different UFO crafts, reverse-engineer crafts, it also goes through a tunnel system in another section of Area 51 called S4. So, it’s only a small section that goes down through that elevator to S4, but the tunnel system with the maglev trains systems and other types of vehicles, it takes you to an expanded range system of S4. It’s a huge facility. It has many different buildings where they test different types of crafts.
(14:30) Then, they have their smaller sections, like what I was seeing with the elevator. S1 is not a huge section, but it’s a medium-sized section. And they have testing laboratories for studying ancient AI spheres, other things, a lot of repositories of information, the generators, the other things that are part of running the underground facility. So, it’s self-sufficient. Those generators power it; they have the tunnel systems that connect to other facilities.
Clinton’s Campaign & The Anti-Russian Roots of the ‘Cultural Left’
Caleb Maupin (New Eastern Outlook) Tue, Aug 30 2016 |
From the perspective of the CIA and the Trotsky-ites, the USSR was Stalinist, and therefore culturally conservative. Therefore, the CIA funded the soft “cultural left.”
The “cultural left” left the scene for awhile, but was incubating in the United States’ universities for many years—until the Democrats decided to make it a part of their party platform after Bush II.
The article is long, and well worth the read.
In recent speeches, including her speech accepting the Democratic Party’s nomination for the presidency, former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton has declared she would work to eradicate “systemic racism.” Clinton did not present any specific strategy or policy to do this, yet each time she has uttered the two-word phrase, “systemic racism,” there is a large burst of applause from her audience. An article from vox.com claimed that use of this term was “major” because it is a phrase that is “embraced in particular by younger activists.”
In her speech, Clinton could have said she would work to eradicate “discrimination” or “under-representation” of minorities, but instead chose to use the favored buzzword of a specific political milieu to whom Clinton’s campaign seems to be pandering. The phrase is part of a whole vocabulary of what some call “oppression theory.” Young people have learned it from their university professors, namely those who teach black studies or gender studies. This new lingo is used on various internet forums, especially Tumblr.
When the Democratic Party nomination was still up for grabs, the internet was filled with Clinton supporters who referred to Sanders supporters as “Bernie Bros,” arguing that supporting the presidential campaign of the senator from Vermont was an expression of “white male privilege.”
Blogs, tweets, and statuses now urge disappointed Sanders supporters to “check their privilege,” consider ramifications of a Trump presidency, and vote for a candidate they despise. If a male Sanders supporter responds to these arguments and defends his decision to support Jill Stein or Gloria La Riva—or any candidate other than Clinton—he is accused of “man-splaining.” As the argument continues, if an opponent of Clinton objects to a personal insult directed toward him, he is “tone-policing.”
Where do these phrases come from? What is this political milieu that the Democratic Party nominee has attached herself to? In the public eye it is often identified as the “far left.” This is not completely accurate.
The entity known as the political left can trace its roots to the French Revolution of the 1790s. Since that time, people who identify as “leftists,” revolutionaries or radicals have used phrases like “liberty” and “solidarity.” They have talked about working toward “emancipation” and “liberation” against “oppression.” They have often used specifically Marxian formulations like “exploitation” and “expropriation” while advocating “power to the working class.” With rhetoric about liberation and opposing injustice, the left has been the traditional home for opponents of racism, sexism, and advocates of social equality.
However, this new milieu that talks of “interconnectedness” and “intersectionality” rather than solidarity. It celebrates global military interventions done for “humanitarian” reasons, while engaging in heated debates about concepts like “cisgender privilege,” accusing its detractors of being “white-splaining” “Bernie bros” who need to “check their privilege.” This is a new development that did not arise naturally from within the [historical anti-imperialist] left.
The Congress for Cultural Freedom
Is it just a coincidence that the interests of neo-con imperialist policy and the social justice wing of the left seem to coincide?
To understand the unique rhetorical style that Clinton has embraced, one must understand what happened at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel back in 1949. Despite the United States being in an anti-communist frenzy, with the House Un-American Activities Committee in full swing, and many Communist Party members being sent to federal or state prisons, the Moscow-aligned Communist Party scored a key public-relations victory.
On March 25th, 1949 the “Scientific and Cultural Conference for World Peace” opened in New York City, and gave voice to a loud, solid critique of U.S. foreign policy. Albert Einstein, Will Geer, Arthur Miller, Aaron Copeland, Lillian Hellman, Frank Oppenheimer, Paul Robeson, W.E.B. Dubois, and many of the most well respected cultural and intellectual figures of the time took the stage at the conference. The speeches not only denounced the military build-up against the Soviet Union, but also defended Soviet military interventions, and presented the USSR as a friendly, socialist society, not the “iron curtain” or “evil empire” portrayed in U.S. media. The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency watched with anger as images of the Waldorf Peace Conference were distributed by media outlets across the planet, discrediting the United States and raising the prestige of the Soviet Union.
In response, the following year the CIA launched a project called the “Congress for Cultural Freedom.” Still today, the project is considered to be one of the agency’s greatest achievements of the Cold-War era. The CIA brags about the project on its website saying it involved: “a cadre of energetic and well-connected staffers willing to experiment with unorthodox ideas and controversial individuals if that was what it took to challenge the Communists at their own game.”
The project involved indirect CIA funding of “cultural leftism.” Across the United States and Western Europe, socialists, communists, anarchists, as well as artists, musicians, academics and film makers started getting CIA money. Many of them were unaware of where this money came from.
The CIA’s website confirms that it subsidized the New York-based Trotskyist magazine called “Partisan Review.” The magazine presented itself as representing the genuine socialism of Karl Marx, Max Shachtman and Leon Trotsky, while opposing “Stalinism” in the USSR. The CIA also promoted the works of Sidney Hook and other “socialist” college professors.
The project went beyond just political activism, and included funding for art galleries, experimental film makers, and most especially, left-wing academics. The CIA funded the printing of George Orwell’s writings, as well as concerts by left-wing musicians. A 2014 article from the Chronicle of Higher Education bemoans the impact of CIA funding for the Iowa Writers Workshop, which promoted what was described as stylistic innovations and breakthroughs in literature.
Why Foment “Cultural Leftism?”
It seems strange that at the time of the Cold War, the U.S. government was intentionally funding people who called themselves radical leftists. However, it makes sense for one key reason: all of the artists, activists, academics, and philosophers who received money from the CIA program were staunchly anti-Soviet.
The CIA intentionally promoted “cultural leftists” hoping to divert people with leftist and dissident instincts away from Soviet communism. A significant political gap between western leftists and the USSR was already developing. Over the course of the 1920s, the Soviet Union grew to be much more socially conservative than during its earliest years. Homosexuality and abortion were outlawed, and the state awarded medals to women who bore more than 10 children.
While Western leftists clung to abstract Marxist concepts like “free love” and “the destruction of gender,” the Soviet Union, fighting for its survival amidst blockades, invasions and foreign subversion, needed to tighten up. Facing constant attack, the Soviet Union was forced to become very authoritarian. With its industries rapidly developing within a previously poor and agrarian society, the Soviet economy required strict regulation. As they faced foreign attacks, Soviet leaders invoked not only Marxist-Leninist principles, but also Russian nationalism. Films portrayed medieval Czars not as tyrants but as patriotic [heroes] fighting off foreign invaders. During the Second World War the Russian Orthodox Church was resurrected and allowed to function within Soviet society.
Despite having a centrally planned, non-capitalist economy, achieving what was often described as “economic miracles” by economists, when it came to cultural issues, the USSR simply did not live up to fantasies of many Western leftists. Many activists who strove for an egalitarian paradise with “total freedom” were quite disappointed with what the Soviet Union had become.
Yet, even despite the growing divide, the Soviet Union had a huge network of international allies. The Communist International and broader People’s Front of anti-fascists represented a massive global current. After the Second World War, the current got even larger around the world due to the very admirable role played by Communists and the USSR itself during the war.
Starting in 1950 the CIA began working to exploit and expand the gap between western radicals and the Soviet Union, in the hope of isolating and defeating the USSR. From the earliest days, some of the project’s participants were already fantasizing about events similar to the “color revolutions” the CIA would be involved in a few decades later. When the project was being planned, the ex-communist academic Sidney Hook said: “Give me a hundred million dollars and a thousand dedicated people, and I will guarantee to generate such a wave of democratic unrest among the masses—yes, even among the soldiers—of Stalin’s own empire, that all his problems for a long period of time to come will be internal. I can find the people.”
Regardless of their intentions, in funding and promoting “cultural leftism” the CIA ultimately remolded the left-wing of politics in the USA and Western Europe.
Eastern Mysticism, Fascism & The Occult
In Western Europe and the United States, Christianity represented the most prominent religious perspective and was promoted by the most centrist and mainstream elements of the political establishment. The radical left generally promoted philosophical materialism and scientific atheism. The occult, paganism, and Eastern mysticism were an obsession of the extreme right.
The Nazis, who considered themselves to be a “party of the right,” had glorified Germany’s pre-Christian religions, frequently invoking Oden and Valhalla in their propaganda. The famed occultist Aleister Crowley, who entertained the rich and powerful in Britain, often vocally aligned with the Conservative Party and considered leftists to be a dirty crowd of uncultured rabble-rousers. As a staunch right-winger the iconic para-normalist said “I hate Christianity as socialists hate soap.”
European fascists often marveled at India’s caste system, seeing it as an antidote to class struggle. Julius Evola, one of the primary Italian far-right intellectuals was also considered an expert on Hinduism and pre-Christian mythology. The Nazis adopted the Swastika as their emblem and called themselves “Aryans” because they identified themselves with the authoritarian structures of ancient India, and believed Germans to be genetic descendents of it.
Within India, the caste system, mystical practices that are designed to attract spirits, along with the strict patriarchal family structure, have been the main targets of social reformers. Many leftists in India accused the British empire of working to reinforce these things in order to effectively weaken the struggle for independence.
Regardless of left and right norms, following the 1950s, as the “cultural left” was re-energized while being re-molded by CIA funding in the United States, it was filled with admirers of traditional Indian culture. Writers like Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg used Hindu chants in their writings, which were distributed and promoted at universities. The International Society for Krishna Consciousness, a very conservative and anti-Communist sect that worships a Hindu Diety, became iconic participants in peace marches.
Similarly, the theocratic and feudal kingdom of Tibet was rewritten into a trendy liberal cause. The Dalai Lama’s regime was considered to be one of the most right-wing, authoritarian and patriarchal kingdoms in the world. The Nazis had been so impressed with the harshly enforced traditional structures of the kingdom that they had dispatched many delegations to study it. The Nazis had actively worked with the regime to fight the Nationalist and Communist forces in other parts of China.
The Dalai Lama asks a little boy to let him French-kiss him
In the 1950s, the CIA sponsored a campaign of guerrilla warfare intended to drive the Communist Party of China from the Tibet Autonomous Region and restore feudal theocratic rule. The book “The CIA’s Secret War in Tibet,” published by the Heritage Foundation, tells how the Dalai Lama’s brother led a team of violent insurgents who were air-dropped into Tibet with U.S.-made weapons.
However, the remolded cultural left which Hillary Clinton now embraces nearly worships the Dalai Lama. The “Free Tibet” movement, which calls for breaking up the People’s Republic of China, is now one of the trendiest “left-wing” causes. One of the favorite books of this “movement” is Seven Years in Tibet, written by Heinrich Harrier, a member of Hitler’s SS, who had been dispatched to Tibet during the Second World War.
“Tune in, Turn On, Drop Out”
The political left had long been outspoken opponents of recreational drug use. Many of the early socialists even opposed drinking alcohol and were part of the broader temperance movement of the early 20th century. However, as CIA money flowed in forging the anti-Soviet “cultural left,” this position was also altered.
According to what was revealed by the Church Committee, a commission set up by the U.S. Congress to investigate the CIA in 1975, the CIA had actively distributed drugs to college students and others as part of “Project MKULTRA.” The CIA had involved many professors and academics in its research and distribution of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) also called “acid.”
This hallucinogen had first been synthetically created by Albert Hoffman, a Swiss chemist, in 1938. During the 1950s, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency had widely experimented with LSD, hoping it could be weaponized and used against the Soviet Union.
Timothy Leary, a Harvard psychology professor, became one of the most well known figures among left-wing students during the 1960s and 70s. He preached “tune in, turn on, and drop out,” and loudly encouraged young people who opposed the Vietnam War and racism to use LSD. In 1999, FBI files were released showing that Dr. Timothy Leary had been an FBI informant for much his career.
As the cultural left emerged, there was a strange re-orientation of the mainstream U.S. media. The press backed away from hard-line celebrations of capitalism and condemnations of dissent. Instead a large section of popular rock bands, university professors, and TV programs almost celebrated the “new left”—specifically its cultural manifestations.
During the upsurge of left-wing political activism during the 1960s and 70s, many Communists who took political direction from the Soviet Union, China, or Cuba identified the campus-based, drug-using, promiscuous, and well-funded anti-Soviet “new left” as problematic. These forces that were organized into disciplined cadre organizations, were a minority, often labelled “tankies” and “hardliners” and denounced by iconic new-left figures like Jerry Rubin.
By the mid-1970s, the new left’s political strength had died down. It remained a kind of small “loyal opposition” in U.S. politics. Peace marches took place, the Green Party was formed, and the new left functioned as a place that could absorb free-thinkers and others with grievances against U.S. society.
While the new left remained isolated, the U.S. government was ruled by people who espoused neo-conservative formulations about “the greatest country in the world” and called capitalism “the greatest system ever created.” The Ford Foundation, various Rockefeller think tanks, along with projects directed by George Soros, funneled money to many who would be considered “left of center,” but they remained a small bloc that was ignored by major political forces.
The New Left Takes Power
The turning point came after the failures of the Bush administration and the 2008 financial crisis dramatically changed the political atmosphere. The U.S.A. clearly has big problems now, and the Republican Party’s political message of “my country right or wrong” and “don’t fix it if it ain’t broke” would no longer suffice.
Amidst Republican confusion and re-messaging, the Democratic Party has now emerged as the most powerful entity in U.S. politics. In order to maintain its grip on power, the Obama presidency and the Clinton campaign are re-energizing the “cultural left.” In 2016, the foot soldiers of the Democratic Party are those who have been trained in NGO-funded, university-based cultural leftism. With the global Communist movement far weaker now, the remnants and descendants of the CIA’s “new left” have a high level of ideological dominance. What was once considered “counter-culture” has become the mainstream.
Now that opponents of the United States on the global stage are much more socially conservative, the pro-war and imperialistic message of the cultural left is far more pronounced. At times, Hillary Clinton’s campaign against Donald Trump sounds almost conservative. The Clinton campaign insinuates that Trump is unpatriotic for avoiding military service during the Vietnam War, and unqualified for the presidency because he uses “offensive” language. According to Clinton’s supporters, Trump is loyal to the Kremlin and admires “dictators”—i.e. regimes that challenge Wall Street dominance.
Hillary Clinton thundered, “America is great, because America is good” during her convention speech, dismissing Trump’s “Make America Great Again” as unpatriotic. Many of the attacks leveled against Trump are not condemning him for being bigoted or authoritarian, but rather for being overcritical of U.S. society [the deep state] and embracing “conspiracy theories.”
According to politics extolled by the Clinton-ites and their foot soldiers, being left-wing, fighting for women’s rights, and opposing injustice means carrying out regime-change. According to Clinton’s cultural left, the battle for “human rights” must continue, and the Pentagon must be utilized to free women, homosexuals, transgender people, and others from “dictators” who do not share their enlightened social perspective. This liberation is to be carried out by arming Islamic extremists, enacting economic sanctions, and firing cruise missiles in order to create chaos and topple regimes deemed to be promoting values contrary to those taught in racial studies and gender studies courses.
Greater confrontation with Russia is considered a good thing because its government is accused of being “homophobic.” Those who point out that Clinton coddles dictators in places like Saudi Arabia, or that U.S. meddling in Syria and Libya has strengthened the menace of ISIL are labelled “conspiracy theorists” who need to “check their privilege” and “stop man-splaining.”
At the same time, pointing out that the U.S.-backed anti-government fighters in Syria are actually Wahabbi fanatics who have slaughtered Christians and Alawites is called “Islamophobia.” Consistent with the argumentative style of the campus-based “privilege politics” milieu, these facts are never refuted. Rather, one is simply accused of some ideological crime or impurity for pointing them out.
As millions of people are rapidly fleeing both Libya and Syria because NATO interventions have toppled independent nationalist governments and made their lives unlivable, [so-called] leftists are applauding the situation. Rather than protest these imperialist crimes which created a mass refugee crisis, the bulk of [so-called] leftists are having parades to “welcome the refugees.” Those who point out that NATO destabilizations have caused a crisis of mass migration and say this is an atrocity that should be opposed, are accused of being bigots and Islamophobes.
The Growing Danger of War
The left that existed prior to the Second World War is something that Clinton-ites would never recognize. Books like Toward Soviet America by William Z. Foster in 1932 laid out a blueprint for a planned economy in the United States, and called for hungry, unemployed working-class people in Kentucky, Ohio, Alabama, and elsewhere to fight back and demand better working conditions.
The mass movements of the 1930s won the creation of Social Security, unemployment insurance, veterans benefits, and much more. The slogan the Communist Party used was “Don’t starve, fight!” Those who were mobilized were not an well-educated cultural elite, but industrial workers, unemployed youth, students, and all kinds of other ordinary Americans who were suffering during the economic crisis known as the Great Depression.
The manufactured and recently empowered “cultural left” with which Clinton has aligned herself would look at such people and tell them they deserve to be destitute, because it would help them better understand what people of color have experienced. It would tell them that demanding jobs was a sense of “entitlement” and “white privilege.” It would tell them that they should celebrate the prospects of war with Russia or China because it would be mean toppling leaders portrayed to be “homophobic” or “oppressive of women.”
Now that the “left” has become something miles away from what it once was, it should be no surprise that lots of working-class white people are embracing Donald Trump and the “alternative right.” Many white people who are suffering during the economic downturn have come to see the left as a current that seeks to punish and shame them, not improve their living situation. Furthermore, the modern left is perceived as looking down on them for not knowing the appropriate “oppression theory” lingo which is being taught at universities.
If organizations emerged that actually made economic appeals and organized against big-money interests in a way that is similar to what was done during the 1930s, the situation could be drastically altered.
However, that is not the case. The “new left,” specifically fostered to counter the influence of global opponents of Western capitalism, has now taken the helm of Western civilization, staffed with a cadre of loyal crusaders fighting in the name of “diversity” and “intersectionality.” Meanwhile, the economy is getting worse and the danger of a bigger military clash between the United States and Russia or China, the two largest countries on earth, is rapidly growing.
The Pleiades is an open cluster consisting of approximately 3,000 stars at a distance of 400 light-years from Earth in the constellation of Taurus.
Taygeta, 19 Tauri Aa (19 Tau Aa), is a subgiant star. It is one of the brightest members of the Pleiades cluster (Messier 45). Taygeta has an apparent magnitude of 4.30 and lies 440 light-years from Earth.
Ashaara (Taygeta)
Suddenly, a flash of light was emitted from the doorway. I found myself floating up, up and away. Curiously, my surroundings had changed from my bedroom to what appeared to be an alien ship. Standing in front of me was a tall brown-skinned alien with a large bald head and indigo eyes. Next to him was a tall blonde-haired, blue-eyed woman with large, wide-set eyes. Her name was Anelsa. She was from a planet called Erra in the Ashaara star system, which we call Taygeta. This woman spoke to me in a methodical language, and I was soon put to sleep by her cold touch on my forehead—a process commonly done to suppress memory. – Megan Rose, Welcome to the Future
Daryl D. James enlisted in the U.S. Navy on January 24, 1999. He served 7 years, including one year in Iraq with the Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 7 (NM SeaBee 7). In 2003, while stationed at the Royal Air Force Base at St. Mawgan, in Cornwall, UK, he passed through what he thought was a metal detector. It was a piece of technology that measured every biometric signature he had, including his intelligence quotient, which was measured as 195. He was soon recruited to join the Secret Space Program and guaranteed a position as a pilot in Solar Warden, the Cabal-controlled star fleet. After a miscommunication with a 9-1/2-foot Reptilian, he was sent to the mines on the Moon.
(54:00) . . . John Titor getting that device he got, that old IBM computer, actually allowed them to get all of this in place—to have time-travel police, so the Cabal can’t continue to interfere using the technology they gained through the Philadephia Experiment from non-terrestrial sources, that then they used in the Montauk Project. And you can read about that; Peter Moon and Preston Nichols’ books, the Montauk series (https://www.skybooksusa.com/).
And so, that is an ongoing thing, because the Cabal has been manipulating us, so now that is no longer possible due to this group. I can’t give the name of the group, but this group does monitor and stop certain things from occurring that have been meddled with by the deep state. They stop the meddling now. And that’s why she is allowed to do what she’s doing, because what she’s doing is undoing meddling that the deep state did.
And part of CERN was to create a merging of this timeline and many others to make it more and more and more high-powered for the New World Order line, like they did with Tartaria, where they ended Tartaria and truncated it into our timeline.
And so, they’re stopping that. The Alliance took over CERN in 2018 and shut it down for awhile; so, that can’t be done anymore, and they removed it. And before that, the reason they couldn’t do it, there were Alliance white-hats in CERN that sabotaged CERN so that could not happen— otherwise we would have been in a world of hurt. So, there are a lot of people who have given their lives, and given the ultimate for the great awakening; we need to be grateful to them for allowing all of us to be here for the great awakening.
(56:45) TAINO: You do find things. Let’s say, people might find historical events, yet when they look at when they were at school, they can’t find anything. So, Gene, in your metaphysical investigations you found that it was those negative factions that actually used time-travel technologies in order to compromise some of the time-lines so that future generations—let’s say, in the 1990s—would not even have the [ability] to identify what were the real historical accounts behind what has been tampered with—another layer of reality.
GENE DECODE: So, certain individuals are gifted with the ability to remember these changes that they’ve been doing, and I’ve had that from birth. One of my best friends, and many, many, many, many more people disappeared from the line, from birth, and it was part of this manipulation that’s now known as the Mandela Effect. And so that’s all part of this ongoing situation. So, because that was creating ripples— when you chage the line, it doesn’t just change it for Earth: it changes it for everything everywhere. So, that’s why the Guardian Alliance and the Infinite Alliance of Free Worlds were able to come here and start to do some intervention. Because the Cabal and the negative alien group broke the law so profoundly, so massively, that it was changing things all over all of the universe. Even into multiverses: merging timelines means merging other universes into this one.
So, that’s a massive violation, so it had to be stopped. So certain allowances were made, as long as free will was maintained. And so that’s now the caveat. They’ve done a new intervention law. Part of the Ganymede meetings were to get a new noninterference law in place, so that you don’t interfere with free will of the individual overall, but you maintain that free will. And so, these interventions that violated our free will are a violation. So they can [go in and] set that right. So it all fits in with the time-travel police—all of this is interlinked.
Stanley Ann Dunham was born in Kansas on Nov. 29, 1942, to a CIA banking executive, Marjorie Dunham, and a “furniture salesman,” Stanley Armour Dunham. She attended middle school in Beruit, Lebanon.
Dunham was of predominantly English ancestry, with some Scottish, Welsh, Irish, German and Swiss, according to Wikipedia.
In 1955, the Dunham family moved to Seattle, Washington, where Stanley Ann’s father was “employed as a furniture salesman and her mother worked as vice president of a bank..”
In around 1960, Stanley Ann was introduced to CIA cult leader Muhammad Subuh when he visited Seattle. The Subud cult later set up operations in Hawaii and Chicago.
Cult leader Muhammad Subuh
Stanley Ann Dunham
In 1961, Dunham gave birth to Barry Hussein Soebarkah, whose name was later changed to Barack Obama.
In 1965, Dunham married an Indonesian graduate student, Lolo Soetoro, who was studying geography under a CIA foreign student program. In 1967, Dunham moved to Indonesia with six-year-old Barry to join her husband. This was in the wake of the 1965-1966 CIA-backed coup and slaughter of between 1 million and 2,500,000 supporters of the Communist Party of Indonesia, the PKI. In Jakarta, Dunham Soetoro worked for CIA front-organizations while her husband worked for the fascist Suharto regime as an engineer. (https://gsp.yale.edu/case-studies/indonesia) (https://www.haaretz.com/2014-01-25/ty-article/.premium/indonesian-ghosts-haunt-obama/0000017f-e9a3-df5f-a17f-fbffe9860000)
Lolo Soetoro, Stanley Ann Soetoro (with daughter Maya), Barry Soetoro
His stepfather, he records, taught him that “Men take advantage of weakness in other men. They’re just like countries in that way. Better to be strong. If you can’t be strong, be clever and make peace with someone who’s strong. But always better to be strong yourself. Always.”
* * *
The author of The Exorcist, William Peter Blatty,was a CIA operative. He was there in Lebanon in the early 1950s with President Obama’s maternal family, the Dunhams. Blatty most likely attended the same Catholic school, College Notre-Dame de Jamhour, where Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, had been a student in Beirut. (see David Icke on Satanism under the guise of religion https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biggestsecret/matrix/matrix16.htm)
Stanley Ann Dunham, Stanley Armour Dunham, Madelyn Dunham
Stanley Dunham family Beirut, Lebanon
Additionally, guess who else was at the CIA station in Beirut, Lebanon in the early 1950s with Stanley Armour, Madelyn, Stanley Ann Dunham, and Blatty, Dr. William Thetford (1951-1954). http://www.miraclestudies.net/BillVita.html
Dr. Thetford was the CIA/MK ULTRA child fantasy expert and author of Oprah Winfrey’s “A Course in Miracles.” Beiruthad been “ground zero” planning the MK ULTRA/MONARCH mind-control project (1953) with SS Hauptsturmführer Josef Mengele.
Dunham is said to have worked for the Ford Foundation while in Indonesia. According to Scott, Dunham had domestic help which allowed her to “work, pursue her interests and come and go as she wanted.”
Obama reportedly attended the Punahou School in Honolulu from the fifth through twelfth grades while living with his grandparents. His mother reportedly returned to Indonesia after doing graduate study in Hawaii during her son’s high school years. Obama has described his mother as “the dominant figure in my formative years.”
According to Scott, Dunham boasted that her son could become “the first black president.” Scott also was critical of Dunham’s parenting of her son when she stated, “Ann uprooted Barry, at age six, and transplanted him to Jakarta. Now she was uprooting him again, at barely ten, and sending him back, alone. She would follow him to Hawaii only to leave him again, less than three years later.”
* * *
Barack Hussein Soebarkah?
By Jason Kissner – American Thinker, January 22, 2014
One of the unexplained mysteries in the scanty documentation of the early life of the 44th President of the United States is the appearance of the name Soebarkah as his last name on an official document filled out by his mother.
In a recent contribution to American Thinker, Nick Chase offers very persuasive evidence that the long-form birth certificate released by Obama is a forgery.
While in the midst of developing an argument supporting the idea that Obama was adopted by the Indonesian Lolo Soetoro, Chase states:
Finally, we have Stanley Ann Soetoro’s 1968 application to extend her 1965 passport (now destroyed) for an additional two years, as shown in Figure PPA.
On the second page of the application, Ann moved to exclude her son Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) from her passport, but the item has been crossed out — perhaps on the advice of the consulate in Jakarta, as this would have left seven-year-old Barry passportless — so it didn’t happen.
The appendage “(Soebarkah)” has never been satisfactorily explained by anyone, and I certainly don’t know what “Soebarkah” means, but it does seem to indicate a name change or change in citizenship status for the boy.
The smallish cult appears to have had, at least circa 2001 and according to this profile of sorts in the Honolulu Advertiser, 20,000 members worldwide. Notice the picture of Deliana Fuddy, then “regional helper” and member of the faith? Let’s return to her Subud status in a second.
Note also that the World Subud organization seems to have been based in, of all cities….wait for it…Chicago. Indonesia…Chicago…Hawaii… three locales linked to Obama’s life.
Next, observe that the Advertiser article states that Subud was introduced to Hawai’i in the 1960s (more on this in the conclusion).
Now to Ann Soetoro. She was linked to Subud by her biographer (and New York Times reporter) Janny Scott (Harvard ’77) in the book A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mother,” reviewed by the New York Timeshere.
Loretta Fuddy was more than merely a follower of Subud; she worked her way up the ranks and became chairwoman of Subud USA, based in Seattle from 2006 to 2008, and was known to Subud not merely as Loretta Fuddy, but as “Deliana” Loretta Fuddy. In fact, you can see that in its headline, the official Subud “memorial” page drops “Loretta” and refers simply to “Deliana” Fuddy.
Ann Soetoro’s close association with members of the Subud cult will be documented below. But first, note in passing that of all the persons — Christian, Jew, Muslim, Buddhist, Atheist, Hindu, or you-name-it — that could have been installed as Director of the State Department of Health in Hawaii, Hawaii alighted on Fuddy — a leader of a small cult with roots in Indonesia and connections to Ann Soetoro — Obama’s mother. Second, observe that Fuddy assumed the Director position in Hawaii in January 2011, just a few months before the release of Obama’s long-form birth certificate.
Now to Ann Soetoro’s links with Subud and to a brief discussion of the Barry “Soebarkah” mystery associated with Ann Soetoro’s 1968 passport renewal application.
Read the following excerpt from SubudVoice in 2011 (and please note that I have italicized a couple of sentences to emphasize that the Subud “Staff Reporter” is drawing on material from Janny Scott’s biography of Ann Soetoro; they aren’t simply making an anonymous, empty assertion that can’t be substantiated.)
Obama’s mother and Subud
By Staff Reporter…
A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mother,a biography of the mother of US President Obama, Ann DunhamSutoro, contains several references to Subud. As is generally known Obama lived with his mother in Jakarta for some years…
Arianne (no second name) wrote to me to say, “Talked to Irin Poellot who is reading the book about Obama’s mother and has already run into several literal mentions of Subud!!! I remember the late Mansur Madeiros mentioning he knew her in Indonesia and he is mentioned in the book! I can’t help wondering if we will get inquiries about Subud since it is mentioned often in a book which probably will be widely read. It also is a delicious fact that our Subud sister, Ms Fuddy, just was appointed to her post in the Health Dept in Hawaii in time to be involved in the documentation of fact that Obama was born there.”
I wrote back asking for more specific information and Arianne replied, “Irin kindly supplied some quotes:In chapter 4 “Initiation in Java” the Subud members are quoted. And then (on page 116): “…she (Ann) was hired to start an English-language, business-communications department in one of the few private non profit management-training schools in the country.”
Ann “found a group of young Americans and Britons enrolled in an intensive course in Bahasa Indonesia, the national language, at the University of Indonesia recalled Irwan Holmes, (a member of the original group). She was looking for teachers. A half dozen of them accepted her invitation, many of them members of an international spiritual organization, Subud, with a residential compound in a suburb of Jakarta..”
And ……Mohammad Mansur Madeiros, a reclusive and scholarly Subud member from Fall River, Massachusetts, and Harvard, whom Ann hired as a teacher, had immersed himself so deeply in Javanese culture, language and religion that friends nicknamed him Mansur Java. When he died in 2007, friends recalled his preference for the company of ordinary Indonesians –street vendors and becak drivers — over that of other Subud members and expatriates.”
But what might the Ann Soetoro, Deliana Fuddy, Subud links really have to do with the sobriquet Barry Soebarkah?
To help answer that, transport yourself backward in time and sit at the feet of the Indonesian Subud master Bapak circa 1963:
Question:1 Many people in Subud change their names. Is this necessary? Is it important? How does the change of a name affect us? Physically, spiritually or both?
Bapak: Brothers and sisters, whether it is necessary or not depends on what you want….
If changing one’s name for “spiritual reasons” was something frequently done by followers of Subud’s Bapak, and Stanley Ann Soetoro was in fact closely associated with Subud, it is reasonable to suppose that “Soebarkah” arose in the same way new names for others (like “Deliana” Loretta Fuddy?) associated with Subud did: as a matter of course depending on the case.
Readers might agree that the above is a quite reasonable account of the origin of Barry “Soebarkah.”
But there is something else. The above biographical material bonds Ann Soetoro to Subud members via an English language, business communications department post. According to the New York Times here, that would have been around 1970 or 1971. However, the passport renewal application with the name “Soebarkah” dates to 1968. This suggests that either the “Soebarkah” handle came from nowhere, or that matters are as we have discussed and that Ann Soetoro in fact came to Subud before 1970 — perhaps in Hawaii. [In Seattle, actually. Dunham was introduced to Muhammad Subuh while a teenager. – the editor]
Clearly, we might want to recall that the above linked Honolulu Advertiser Subud profile indicates that Subud was introduced to Hawai’i in the 1960s.
In closing, the Ann Soetoro’s 1968 passport renewal application raises the spectre of possible Obama birth certificate fraud yet again. Have a look at page 2 of the document:
“Soebarkah” appears in the section labeled “Amend to Include (Exclude) Children.” The name Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) is crossed out.
Nick Chase has concluded that this signifies that Ann Soetoro had improvidently decided to exclude Barack from her passport renewal. Chase thinks that Soetoro changed her mind about exclusion after having been informed by the Consulate that doing so would leave Barack passportless.
But there is another possibility — one just as valid on its face.
What if Soetoro was trying to include Obama in the renewal, but she wasn’t able to produce a birthcertificate, and the Subud name “Soebarkah” just didn’t do the trick?
That could explain why the name Subud name “Soebarkah” appears nowhere else (that we are aware of anyway).
Of course, we might then have to wonder exactly how Obama did his traveling at certain points in time, but then perhaps Subud is, at least at times, more than a mere cult?
Dr. Jason Kissner is associate professor of criminology at California State University, Fresno. You can reach him at crimprof2010@hotmail.com.
WND has reported previously that Dunham was registered for college classes in Seattle only 15 days after reportedly delivering her first-born child in Honolulu, according to school records.
WND research supports the conclusion that Dunham left Hawaii to relocate to Seattle within days of her baby’s birth to begin night classes at the University of Seattle.
On July 29, the University of Washington e-mailed WND Dunham’s grade transcript covering her attendance at the university, specifying that “Ms. Stanley Ann Dunham was enrolled at the University of Washington for: Autumn 1961, Winter 1962, Spring 1962.”
The e-mail from the University of Washington registrar did not say Dunham was enrolled in Hawaii for correspondence extension classes she took in Hawaii.
As is clear from the transcript itself, in the autumn term 1961, Dunham took two classes: Anthropology 100, beginning on Aug. 19, 1961 and ending on Dec. 11, 1961; and Political Science 201, beginning on Aug. 19, 1961 and ending on Dec. 12, 1961.
Ann Dunham’s University of Washington transcript makes clear she obtained a grade of “A” in Anthropology 100 and a grade of “B” in Political Science 201, making it likely she attended both classes when they began on Aug. 19, 1961.
In the winter term 1962, Dunham took two additional courses: History 478, beginning on Dec. 27, 1961, and ending on March 30, 1962; and Philosophy 120, beginning on Dec. 27, 1961, and ending on March 20, 1962.
All four of these classes are listed in the transcript as University of Washington extension courses.
The transcript also appears to document as a transfer credit from the University of Hawaii the Russian class where Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. allegedly first met.
Even though Dunham was a graduate of Mercer Island High School, a Washington state high school, she did not qualify for in-state resident tuition benefits because she had not resided continuously in Washington since receiving her high school diploma.
The Seattle babysitter recalls Obama ‘mama’ in evening classes
Mary Toutonghi, the babysitter for Barack Obama Jr., told WND that Dunham was attending night classes at the University of Washington campus.
Toutonghi was managing the house at 516 13th Ave. E. in the Capitol Hill area of Seattle when Ann Dunham moved into the apartments on the first floor above the garage.
Toutonghi told WND that she did not remember exactly when Dunham and her infant son moved in but she commented that Dunham took courses in the evening at the University of Washington.
“Most of the courses at the university that Ann attended started around 4:30 in the afternoon,” she said. (https://www.wnd.com/2009/08/106258/)
* * *
In November and December, 2007, three gay men were murdered. Their names were Larry Bland, Nate Spencer and Donald Young. They were shot execution-style with bullets to the back of the head.
What they had in common — openly gay, African American, living in Chicago — was they also all went to the same church, Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ, where Donald Young, 47, had been the choirmaster for two decades.
Young was killed two days before Christmas of 2007. A few days before that, he phoned Larry Sinclair, a gay white man he had never met, on a cell phone number that very few people knew, as Sinclair later reported in a deposition to Chicago police.
Young gave Larry Sinclair a terrifying warning, that Bland and Spencer were murdered, and he knew he, himself, could be next, and he warned Sinclair that he could be on the kill list, too. But he also probed him to find out whom he had talked to, who else knew what Sinclair knew.
Larry Sinclair’s fateful deed to merit imminent execution: in 1999, on two occasions, November 6th and 7th, he consumed narcotics and had sex with the state senator for Illinois’s 13th District—the first time in the back of a limousine and the second in a hotel room. Furthermore, the drugs were furnished by the elected official. A picture is worth 1,000 words: in the back of the limo, Sinclair performed oral sex on the state senator, whose head was tilted back as he inhaled from a crack pipe.
Two weeks after the ominous phone call from Young, in January of 2008, Barack Obama had won the Democratic Party’s Iowa caucus.
Andrew Basiago met a young Barry Soetoro on missions to Mars
Mars missions allowed NSA to classify all information about Obama under the 1947 National Security Act, including where he was born
Obama appointed “alleged birth mom,” Stanley Ann Dunham, to head DARPA, epicenter of crimes against children, human research, stratospheric particulate spraying, biowarfare
(14:00) The problem is official state secrecy, and the abuse of it. Without official state secrecy, somebody in the secret space program would know that he was in the secret space program and would know what his medical problems are. . . . So official state secrecy has been abused to the detriment of American citizens who bravely served in these programs, and I’m one of them. Another thing they did is, they didn’t pay us or medically monitor us, simply to keep such programs secret. I consider that evil.
(16:00) In Project Pegasus we were given one alter. I took the name, Michael. Because they wanted to create a line of bifurcation between our ordinary persona, our given names and personality—what we were known as among our family members, our friends in the neighborhood and at school—but then when we were in training for time-travel, be known by a different name.
Now, that attempt to create a dual personality in me failed, because when I was in New Mexico hanging out with my dad and other project personnel, they literally said to me, when I said, “Why aren’t you calling me Michael,” rather than Andrew or Andy, they said, “Andy, we don’t play that game here. You’re Ray’s son, Andy or Andrew, to us. Would you like us to call you Andy? Is that what your friends are calling you?” And I said, “Yes.” So, they called me, Andy. And that in fact allowed me to remember so much of what Project Pegasus did.
But we were all given the propensity to have a split personalty, truly delimited to, literally, a split in consciousness. Yes, so, I did have that treatment, but not that experience.
In Mars we were known by our true names and there wasn’t any attempt to give us DID or MPD, as it’s called. So there’s no fracturing of the mind. We were all in college, we had certain traits that they liked, and they trusted us with being ourselves, so to speak. But they did threaten us not to the reveal anything about the program.
Mars
(18:00) I was trained in 1980 with about 20 other young people. We weren’t kids: we were in our late teens and early 20s. I was 18 in 1980—August and September of 1980. We were trained at College of the Siskiyous, a California community college in Weed, California.
I was trained with individuals who would ultimately come forward, like William Brett Stillings and Bernard Mendez, but [also] individuals who would come forward not at all, like Regina Dugan, or who would come forward on a public limited hangout, like Barry Soetoro, who would actually become president of the United States with the name Barack Obama. He told me his name was Barry Soetoro and he was from Indonesia.
William B. Stillings
Bernard Mendez (1926-2010)
Regina Dugan
ARKHEIM: Do you think that maybe Barry Soetoro could be an alter, or Barack Obama could be a programmed alter that was made to be our president? Do you think that Barack Obama is one hundred percent consciously aware of what he experienced on Mars?
Obama at Occidental College
Obama (1979-1981)
Occidental College
ANDREW: Possibly not. Generally, I think the psyco-history of Barry Soetoro—using the invented name of Barack Obama, which was actually the name of a fellow student of his alleged mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, at the University of Hawaii at Manila. There was evidence that he didn’t know how he was Barack Obama, because when I knew him from 1980 to ’82, we knew him as Barry, and he told me his name was Barry Soetoro (see Appendix).
(20:00) ANDREW: The general answer to your question is, I don’t think the psycho-history of Barry Soetoro/Barack Obama has yet been written. I think it may yield evidence even regarding the nature of his marriage and the identity of his life-partner, Michelle.
Michelle Obama making the sign of the devil’s horns
Now, the thing I would say specifically is, when Bernard Mendez and I contacted President Obama through an intermediary, when Michael Ralph, Arthur Neumann, myself, Brett Stillings and Bernie had come forward, Bernie had more extensive contact with the U.S government than any of us. And he claimed that he had gotten through to President Obama through an intermediary. It may have been Tommy Vitor, the press secretary for his National Security Council; but whoever it was, Bernie had no reason to lie over that.
Because when we first came forward, President Obama lied about us and said the only contact he had with Mars was watching “Marvin the Martian” on Saturday morning cartoons with his two young daughters. But then, secretly to Bernie Mendez, with Bernie sharing his information with me, President Obama said, “I can’t come forward now: it’s too sensitive, because I’m president.” And we said we knew that, but we also knew that if we didn’t reveal your involvement, people were saying we were either lying or covering for you.
(22:00) So, we had to come forward, despite the fact that claiming that the current sitting president would harm our apparent truth-value. People say, “Oh, this can’t be true,” right? But he said, “I’ll come forward after I leave the presidency.” He did not do so, and I wrote President Obama on July 28th of 2020. And I said, “Barry”—I didn’t call him Barack because I had always known him as Barry—Barry Soetoro—and I said, “Barry, if you don’t reveal that you were in the program, despite how people view your performance as president or feel about you personally, you are going to be known as a scoundrel among presidents, because you were in fact the first American astronaut—albeit you got to to the red planet in a slightly different way than the Apollo Astronauts got to the moon—but you’re going to be known as a scoundrel for lying about your fellow astronauts who did something very dangerous and very courageous by going to Mars. You were sometimes going with us. There’s many people who agree that you were one of our fellow chrononauts.”
And he said, “I know. I remember the program. I remember Andy vividly.” This is what he told Bernie Mendez on my behalf. “But everything about the program seems vague and dreamlike, so I just don’t feel comfortable coming forward now. But I will come forward when I leave the White House.”
So, in answer to your broader question of whether essentially Barack Obama could be a Manchurian candidate, in the sense that somehow in his upbringing or even in his preparation for the White House he could have been given mind-control programming, I think that’s implicit in the very answer that he gave Bernard Mendez through an intermediary. Even saying that such a vivid program seemed vague and dreamlike would indicate that there was some alteration of his memories. But I can’t really fault him for that more than the rest of us, because we were all getting memory suppression.
(24:00) ARKHEIM: Yeah. I can relate to that statement: vague and dreamlike. I understand what he means.
ANDREW: Major Ed Dames was using the Soviet memory-suppression device, the Soviet leda machine. It was kind of like a helmet they would put on your head for a half-hour, and it would create these jarring bizarre sound tones and video images in your field of vision. And so, if the treatment that we got was given to Barry—later to be known as Barack Obama—he’s just another loyal and faithful American who agreed to serve, who then had his memories blocked, and hence his ability to talk about it 30 years later. . . .
(26:00) I’m going to tell you about how we were getting there and you’ll see. We were getting to Mars by going into an elevator at a Hughes building at 999 North Sepulveda in El Segundo, California. And then we would go to the eighth floor of that building, the top floor, and that elevator would begin morphing from a box into a cylinder.
999 N. Sepulveda Blvd.
999 N. Sepulveda Blvd.
And when we started the program in 1981, started going [to Mars] in the program in 1981, Mars was relatively distant from Earth in its two-year irregular orbit around the Sun in our solar system. But then as it drew closer and closer to Earth, you would only have to spend about eight minutes in that device. So, that indicates we were going to the real Mars. There’s other proofs that we’ve constructed that it was in fact the real Mars. But there were no signs there, except one in one of the jump rooms.
But, okay, so the elevator would morph from a box into a cylinder and then back into a box, and the far wall of that box would open up, and we were in the sub-basement of one of the eight or so U.S facilities on Mars. Now it was in the middle latitudes of Mars, but we don’t know whether it was the northern or the southern hemisphere. We certainly were not in the really hot part, the equatorial region, or the snowy part that’s been shown in some photographs, ever. It’s always the middle latitudes.
And he knew it. He admitted he was in the program, and that he remembered me vividly. In fact, we had been friends and roommates for a short period of time in the program. And I had even asked him his name, and he said, “Barry, Barry Soetoro.” And I said, “Oh, well I have a very similar name; it’s really some of the cadence of your name. It’s Andy Basiago.” And I said, “Pleased to meet you, Barry.” So, that whole kind of Alex-Jones-based claim—you know, the claim of the birthers that his name was Barry Soetero—was almost true. It was Barry Soetoro. This is— his current half-sister is Maya Soetoro.
(29:00) So, he acknowledged it to Bernard Mendez and I—one of my fellow jumpers. Yet, you know, we’re still having major media describe the constitutional diligence that candidates for president, like President Trump and I, showed [as us] being “birthers” about this president. And it was all spun into sort of an anti-black policy, but it wasn’t: it was an attempt to have a president who was fulfilling Article II of the U.S. Constitution, that to be elected and to serve as president you have to be “natural born.” I know that Mr Obama was not “natural born.”
(30:40) So, he acknowledged it to Bernard Mendez and I. One of my fellow jumpers knew him. And his alleged birth mom, Stanley Ann Dunham, gave a brilliant lecture about cross-cultural communications, what we would need to have on Mars. And just like the education we got from Ed Danes, we later credited that lecture from Stanley Ann Dunham as showing us how to behave on Mars so we would save our lives there. So I have fond memories of Mr. Obama, as he’s now known, and his alleged birth mom.
(31:30) But I do believe that, to the extent that we were all subjected to memory suppression, that he clearly was, too. Because there have been some people who are quite bright, like Stanley Ann Dunham, who Obama appointed the first female and the 19th director historically of the DARPA—the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency—who had also gone on to receive a PhD from Cal Tech, who has said absolutely nothing about our claims. And that’s either because she’s adhering the project’s secrecy, which we were all threatened to do, or because she just doesn’t remember. It is a strange set of facts, but what did we have left but to tell the truth? And we have.
(38:00) . . . and when I wrote that paper I was still blocked about my visits to Mars. There was about—I don’t know—20 or so between 1981 and ’84.
(40:00) . . . solar system catastrophe of 9,500 BC, which means a genetic cut-off from Earth, Earthlings of eleven thousand, five hundred years. In other words, we haven’t bred with that type of Martian for almost 12,000 years.
(50:20) What I’ve been able to learn is that apparently the the claim of a German presence in Antarctica and on Mars began with Clark McClellan. Now, we know Clark served at NASA under Werner von Braun, and Clark was reporting that Von Braun and other Germans at NASA were doing the Nazi salute to each other, even though they were then working for the United States!
(55:00) ARKHEIM: Let’s move on to the Montauk chair. You had interaction with the Montauk chair far before I did, because you were in the programs earlier, when they were still figuring things out, and you encountered more than one chair. There were several chairs, is that correct?
ANDREW: Yes, but they were doing the same thing. One was kind of [synthetic upholstery] and one was leather. But they were being operating by people with post-doctoral degrees. One of the post-docs was named David, and I think that could have been David Lewis Anderson, the later time-travel claimant. He wrote me after I appeared on Coast and said, “It sounds like we had contact with different parts of DARPA’s experiments with time travel.” So, I consider David Lewis Anderson a [strong] claimant regarding his time-travel experiences.
(56:00) But what it was we were told—first of all, it was never called the Montauk chair: it was called the chair. And the person—and this is how we can link up historical events—the member of Project Pegasus, the team member,who introduced us to the chair was Jack Pruett. Well, Nichols and Moon identify him as the research director of Project Montauk, when it was founded as Project Montauk in the early ’80s. And I was put in the Montauk chair by Jack Pruett and David whoever-he-was years earlier, like in the late ’60s, early ’70s—a good 12 years earlier.
(57:00) It was just called the chair. And what it did is, it started vibrating, and you you rose off the chair, and you felt you were going feet-first, like a sloosh ride, and you’d go across this black plane, and then you’d see elements of the future ahead of you, and then you would slam into a moment in your own subjective future.
(57:30) We were told that that was one of the devices on Project Pegasus out of eight or nine that had been reverse-engineered from an ET craft. What it was was the the pilot seat aboard a particular UFO that gave the ETs knowledge of what was in space so they wouldn’t crash into it. And then we realized that if we used psychic children, we could get glimpses of their personal futures. But then, as we were doing such rides— I did a lot of rides probably about 40 Montauk-chair rides, most of them in my public elementary school, Mount View Road School in Morris Plains, New Jersey.
(58:30) When I was on the project, they found that the the moments in our subjective future, just like any moment in our present, is really a tripartite outcome. And so, they realized the Montauk chair was of slightly dubious value. So, for example, if you want to take a certain girl to the high school prom, she’ll either say, “Yes,” or you’ll have to go to the prom with another person, or you just won’t go to your prom. If you want to go to a certain college, you’ll either get into your college of first choice, or your alternate choice, or you’ll do something else rather than go to college. All choices, all moments, in particular moments in time-space during our lives, and hence in our futures, are tripartite in outcome.
(59:30) You know, if you walk in the hallway in your office building at work, you go into the hallway and there’s a left or a right, or you don’t go into the hallway, right? So, the Montauk chair was somewhat beneficial. Like, they would ask us, “Okay, Andy, what did you see?” And I’d say, “I was watching television.” And they would say, “Who was on television?” And I said, “The president United States.” And they’d say, “What is the name of the president United States when you saw him giving a talk on television?” And I would say, “Barack Obama.” And they would say, “Barack Obama—is that what you said?” And I said, “Yes.” And they’d say, “Well that was rather unusual, wasn’t it?” And I’d say, “Yeah.” So, they were grappling with the collateral information they would yield of our subjective futures—not so much our personal, but the group’s collective future—via the Montauk chair.
(1:12:00) And in terms of African royalty, um, if Napoleon II had that affair with Princess Sophie (of Bavaria), he was actually the father of my great-great grandfather, Ferdinand Maximilian. Now, the African connection and Napoleon Bonaparte would be Corsican. In fact, he was so dark-skinned that the, elite, uh, aristocratic European women of his era would not go out with him.
Now, that could explain Barry Soetoro. Barack Obama told me when we were just young men, 18 years old—he’s only 45 days older than me; he was born on August 4th and I was born on September 18th of 1961—that he was the son of Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo, the Javanese Indonesian founder of Subud in Indonesia. So, that would explain the fact that a Javanese son of Subuh was a black man, was sort of trained for the U.S. presidency. So, yeah, there was— possibly there was an elite aristocratic genetic origin for the selection of the children involved.
Barack Obama—told me when we were just young men, 18 years old, that he was the son of Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo, the Javanese Indonesian founder of Subud in Indonesia
S. Ann Dunham 1973
S. Ann Dunham in Jakarta
Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo
Barry Soetoro, aka Soebarkah
In 1968, Stanley Ann Dunham listed her son’s name on her passport renewal, and then it was crossed out. She wrote “Barack Hussein Obama Soebarkah” and listed his religion as Islam.
The name of the CIA cult Dunham was in was Subud, and it was founded by Bapak Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo. Subuh means “rising sun.” It was a practice in these cults for the leader to father many children by the female followers. (https://12160.info/m/discussion?id=2649739:Topic:1537295)
“For those who want to get out of the influence of the programs of mind control, you must have a strong fighting instinct to do what is right regardless of what others are doing. Your only cage is the one you build for yourself. You must connect with your highest self to break the evil that is all around us, and not succumb to doing evil just because everyone else is doing it. Retain your fundamental sense of right and wrong.”
“It all goes back to the basic conflict, basic good and evil. It is like the dark forces in power of the planet at this time are trying to cheat their way into heaven or higher dimensions.”
According to Andy, the Illuminati tried to recruit him, offering him a high Masonic degree, referring to him as their ”Illuminati golden boy.” Andy claimed that they kept trying to bribe him into being cooperative and breeding for them, but he refused. Andy despised them with a passion and was determined to take them down, if only he knew how. I asked him what he thought was the greatest threat to the Illuminati. He replied, “Jesus Christ.” (https://www.auricmedia.net/project-superman-the-saga-of-andy-pero/)
Project Superman: The Saga of Andy Pero
By Eve Frances Lorgen
Fall 2000
In August of 1998, I met Andy Pero in Philadelphia, PA while attending Bob Eure’s CIREAP group. At the time I was scheduled to be a speaker on my Alien Abduction research. Preston Nichols also presented his material that evening. Preston brought Andy Pero with him this evening as a surprise guest to share some of his “Montauk Boy” experiences.
After I first lectured, Andy walked up to me to tell me that he had been in underground bases, and recalled a memory of walking down a hallway in some underground facility, seeing women and children in chickenwire cages, screaming for help. He also said he’d seen reptilians. After Preston lectured on his material, he handed over the floor to Andy. Andy spoke about his Montauk time travel experiences, mind programming, electroshock treatments, and training sessions to be a multi-talented covert operative and assassin for his Nazi mind programmers within the U.S. government. Andy described how his mind was split through trauma, electroshock, and sophisticated programming techniques. He told us about his training in Silva Mind Control as a youth, and how he was able to do extraordinary human feats under mind-control programming, such as jumping off high buildings without injury—hence the nickname, Superman. He, had a good knowledge of the occult and metaphysical world, but also knew the power of prayer.
When Andy first “broke programming,” and memories surfaced of being a covert operative in a sub-project of the Montauk Project, he was “gung-ho” about wanting to take down the whole “evil Nazi mind-control regime.” He claimed that he and thousands of others had been victimized by this type of mind-control experimentation. He was well aware of the Draco reptilian-Illuminati connection and had a few run-ins with reptilian shapeshifters himself.
Interview With Andy Pero, Montauk ‘Superman’ Programming Victim
By Eve Frances Lorgen
June 13, 2000
Andy Pero first went public with his story in August of 1998 as a special guest of Preston Nichols while at a lecture series hosted by Bob Eure of Philadelphia, PA. I was so astounded with Andy’s testimony, that I interviewed him personally so that his story could be shared with readers of Unknown Magazine. For those who are unfamiliar with me, I have worked for ten years investigating and counseling UFO experiencers, abductees and occasionally survivors of various forms of anomalous trauma, such as ritual abuse and mind control. Because of my background in alien abductions, paranormal, the occult and anomalous trauma, I recognized Andy as an extraordinary survivor of trauma based mind control, one whose story should not remain hidden.
Eve Lorgen: Andy, where are you from originally and when did your training begin?
Andrew Pero: I was born in Fallon, Nevada in November of 1969. My father was a Lieutenant Commander at the Fallon Naval Air Station in Nevada at the time. I believe my first experiences began by the time I was two-and-a-half years old. At five years old my family lived in Munich, Germany and I remember attending two distinct kindergarten classes, on in German that was located on or near McGraw Army Troop Army Base, and another kindergarten in English.
I have flashback memories of torture sessions as early as age two, where I was subjected to shock treatments with needles inserted in my ears and genitalia. What they (the controllers/handlers) do is use extreme trauma to separate the mind from the body. They do this to split the mind into several parts that can later be programmed to do things, such as superhuman feats. Basically, they disconnect all of the normal human brain impulses, emotions and whatever is normally present, then reprogram you with new ones. They do this to remove all fear, so that when they program new abilities, you will not have the instinctual, “but I can’t; I’m afraid” response. They program you to do, not think. In essence, they treat and program your mind as if it were a computer.
A Victim of the Illuminati’s ‘Super-Race’ Projects and Montauk Experiments Speaks Out
By Michael Andrew Pero – Posted Oct. 27, 1999
This technique works so well that many of the parents and teachers think that I am now doing steroids. I am not, but the situation snowballs into a witch hunt and they make me take a steroid test.
What happened was this: as I am working out one day, Father Jack (the local priest who is always hanging around the kids and the football team) comes into the weight room. He says to me “Andy, there is a lot of talk about your steroid usage, and if you admit it to me right now, every thing will be all right.”
“Father Jack” I said “I don’t use steroids.” He says “I’m going to ask you one more time to admit to using steroids.” I look him right in the eye and I say “Look, Father, I DON’T use steroids.” And he got very angry and says to me—and I will never forget this—“Don’t ever speak to me again, you f*cking liar. They are going to hang you by your balls, and I am going to be there to watch!”
A few days later, Jeff Brown (one of the kids on the team) comes in to the weight room and tells me that Father Jack wants to see me at the grammar school as soon as I am done. When I finish my workout, I go up to the school, and Father Jack is waiting for me impatiently. He grabs my arm and I get brought in front of some kind of panel in the basement of the grade school located down the street. There are four members of the panel and the rest of the room is filled with teachers and parents.
Dr. Purrizzo (Pizzurro) is the chief orthopedic surgeon at Valley Hospital in Bergen County, New Jersey. Bergen county is the third most affluent area in the country, and the towns of Saddle River and Ramsey are in the top towns in the country in terms of wealth. Dr. Purrizzo (Pizzurro) is a heavy hitter in the area, if you know what I mean. When President Nixon, who resided in Saddle River before he died, hurt his knee playing tennis, Dr. Purrizzo (Pizzurro) was the surgeon who performed the operation, and for awhile was on the presidential list of referral surgeons.
I am standing in front of the panel and Purrizzo (Pizzurro) starts pressing me to admit that I am doing steroids, and I keep answering that “I DIDN’T DO IT!” He keeps pressing me, saying that among the panel they hold seven PhD’s, and he thinks they know what they are talking about, so “make it easy on yourself and just admit it.” And I keep telling them that “I DON’T GIVE A SHIT WHAT YOU SAY AND I DON’T CARE WHO YOUR ARE AND WHAT YOUR CREDENTIALS ARE: I DIDN’T DO IT!”
He tells me to take off my shirt to the show the acne on my back, but there is no acne. This sort of thing goes on for awhile, and he finally tells me to “take off your shorts or admit to doing steroids.” What could I do? So I took off my shorts and I volunteered to give a urine sample. I had to piss in a cup in front of the panel as well as everyone else wearing only my sneakers. He is very pissed at me and does not give me my shorts back for quite awhile.
One of the other members of the board is Dr. Purrizzo’s (Pizzurro’s) friend. He is a psychologist, and between the two of them, they now start saying that they are going lock me up in for being mentally insane if I don’t admit to taking steroids. And again, I say, “LOOK, I DIDN’T DO IT!” This goes on and on. I had gone through a whole defense proving that I didn’t do it and no matter what I said and no matter what proof I presented, I was going to be hanged, whether I did it or not.
Finally, I say, “Tell me how you know that I take steroids—what’s your proof? Do you have a camera in my house or something? How do you know?” Finally after much persuasion from the crowd and from myself, he reluctantly explains that he has a degree in genetics, and that he has been studying my genetic code for years. He then goes on to explain how his son’s genetic pattern is superior to mine in terms of dominate DNA markers. He had been doing a private “thesis” study showing how, through superior genetic breeding and steroid usage, he could create a superior human being.
He had a test subject and a control subject. His son was the test subject, and I was the control subject. He had been injecting his own son with steroids for years, and since his son’s DNA pattern was superior to mine, his son, in theory, should have been more physically developed then me. And since he wasn’t, Dr. Purrizzo’s (Pizzurro’s) only explanation was that I must have been taking steroids as well, and he must prove that I was or else his life’s work will have been wasted.
This was all a great theory; however, where he had made his mistake was in assuming I was of Italian descent because my last name is Pero. He was comparing my DNA patterns against the same ones he had used for his son, who is Italian. He never bothered to ask if I was Italian—I am NOT. My background is Hungarian, Romanian, and Czech. This makes all the difference in the world, and I manage to get out of there unscathed.
When the test comes back, it is negative, and I tell all those involved that they can go “stick it where the sun doesn’t shine.” The whole episode is quite funny as I turned their witch hunt into a circus—especially my defensive strategy. For the rest of the school year, all the people who were at the trial all gave me the dirtiest looks imaginable, all because I had the nerve to stand up for myself and say “I didn’t do it!” This was Ramsey, New Jersey, and the sentiment was that they didn’t care if I was falsely accused—they would not stand for a child talking to them in that manner. It was all videotaped, and at one time there were several copies floating around. Anyway, as a result of this, I stop using this technique for awhile. But I hadn’t seen the last of Dr. Purrizzo (Pizzurro).
I am 18 years old and in the second half of my senior year of high school. This experience was very scary because I saw the “adult” world for what it really was. As a child, you grow up believing that adults are all-knowing and are on top of things. But as Dr. Purrizzo (Pizzurro) was telling me that if I didn’t admit to taking steroids, he was going to have me committed to a mental institution and have a lobotomy performed on me, I looked around, and ALL the other adults just stood around like scared sheep. Not one of them said a word in my defense. This was the strangest feeling, being a child and seeing the adult world for what it really was. I realized then that adults are exactly the same as children, only they are bigger. There is one bully that runs the show, and everyone else just stands around, too scared to say anything, just as children do.
(1:19:00) Black goo is an AI in concentrated form. It’s somewhat thick, like motor oil. It tastes like motor oil—I know this because I drank it in space. It almost immediately doubles or triples your IQ. It heals almost everything wrong with your body, and if it can’t, it will leave, so you’ll be throwing stuff up. Remember when Max Spiers died, he threw up the black goo? It extends your lifespan, so, instead of the normal 75, maybe 80 years, you might get 200, and you’ll be healthy for most of it. But it does it at the expense of your human emotions. The only emotion you’re left with is anger. But your psionic abilities are enhanced, so you kind of turn out like Darth Vader.
Now, the reason I drank it was because I was a navigator, and it was my job to bring a ship or ships into hyperspace and bring them out together with no life forms stuck in inanimate objects. Now, that’s challenging on a good day, and the black goo made my job easier, and it was a safety issue for my crew. So, that’s why I did it. Now, the Germans don’t force you; it’s a personal choice. But they encourage officers, especially captain and above, to imbibe simply because the ETs that we work with are already at that IQ level, and we have been so taken advantage of. I mean, you look at how normal people treat folks with Down’s Syndrome, and think about that in an ET situation. And so, they wanted their higher officers to be at the same level with the ETs that we interacted with.
Now, the trouble is, black goo is dangerous. It’s a synthetic life form; it has a will of its own; it has an agenda of its own. And it will treat a species well for about 200 years, and then it decides that it’s tired of being the servant and wants to be the master. And it goes through a culture, and it will bring your technology level up to the point that you can create bodies for it. And then it will inhabit those bodies, and then it will take over your world, and it will decide that the organic life forms are competition for resources. And at that point, it starts killing everybody off—not unlike what’s happening right now with our elites.
So, yeah. It’s a very, very, very dangerous thing, and is probably the most dangerous thing in space right now. And the fact that we have deposits of it on Tula Island, in Portugal, in Germany—and those are the ones I know of. Now, we have deposits of it on Earth. So, those are things we need to keep an eye on, because that stuff’s dangerous.
Now, if you can keep it as a servant, like the Mantid Empire turns it into the gel for the regeneration tanks, then you’re doing great. But the story from ETs is that the Lyran system had a war with the Draco and they ended up with a lot of Lyran-Draco hybrids. And that the Lyran king was unhappy about that, so he re-programmed the black goo AI to eliminate hybrids. Well, when you come down to it, every species is the hybrid of what they developed from, and he didn’t make the parameters tight enough; so, the black goo is why there are no more Lyrans. It’s dangerous—it has completely destroyed entire galaxies. When they made the first Star Trek movie, black goo is the machine world.
(1:08:00) AJ Roberts: But do you think things like “The Simpsons,” for example—I’ve seen there are so many episodes where they show you years ago what is happening now, even Sept. 11 and stuff like that. Do you think there are elements of Project Looking Glass involved in things like “The Simpsons” and stuff like that, that they already know what the future’s going to hold?
Penny: I think they already know what the future is going to hold. I mentioned in my biography that I gave you that I did time at Montauk. That’s what Montauk was about, was changing the future and the past. It was a time-travel project, where we were sent to change things in order to give the CIA more power, and to make sure that they maintained that power.
Penny Bradley: It’s a black-hole portal that goes through time, and you sit in a chair. The chair originally came out of a space ship, and it operates by the user’s consciousness—by his psychic abilities. So, if you’re sitting in the chair and you function interdimensionally, you will travel physically with the chair. If you are more of a reader, a remote-viewer, you will travel and posess the body of someone that’s there. So, it depends on what your abilities are. I’ve interviewed Joseph Powell: he’s one that would possess the body of someone that’s already there. I went physically. Arkheim Ra talked about going, but he didn’t make a distinction whether he went physically or through consciousness.
(1:12:00) When I was at Montauk, we were working on the butterfly effect: it’s a time-travel theory in physics. And we proved that there are key individuals who, if you mess with them, you do affect history, but that [interfereing with] most people—most everything—[will not create a new timeline].
GENE DECODE on The Galactic Talk with Taino
inscribedonthebelievingmind.blog 