Return to Index

Part 11:  A Seven-foot Draco; The Moon Landings

Astrological charts

(5:08:16)

Now, one of the other things I think I need to cover here is why, when I was converted from Ed Cameron to Al Bielek, why was the Bielek family chosen?  That took many, many years to understand, even after I was aware of the fact that I was not originally a Bielek, but was Ed Cameron.

Many years ago, having an interest in astrology, I went to a friend of mine—this was before I became aware of my real history.  He was a geologist, but an amateur astrologer, but very good, and I asked him if he would chart for me.  And he did, as Al Bielek. And he said it was a very complex chart; he didn’t really understand it all.  There were five fire-signs in one house, and it was obvious that I had a lot of problems.  And he went through the list of them, and needless to say, there was quite a number of problems, which, he was quite correct in his analysis. And he simply didn’t understand it.

Quite some years later, after my recovery of the memory of Ed Cameron, and the fact that I was born on 4 August, 1916, I went back to him.  And I asked him, “Would you mind doing another chart for me?”  And I said “I have some new information that my original name was other than that, and I was born on 4 August, 1916.”  And he said, “Okay.”  So, he did up the chart, and looked at it, and he said, “I don’t believe it.”  I says, “Well, what is it you don’t believe?”  And he said, “This is exactly the opposite of the one as Al Bielek.”  And I said, “What do you mean, exactly the opposite?”  He says, “Well, it shows here you had good social standing, good social position, you had no problems with money, you had every opportunity open to you,” and it was sort of like a wide-open book of somebody who would be highly successful.  Well, it was quite true that that was the case, and the family had a lot of money, good social position, and I did, through the period that I was Ed Cameron.

The only thing I can see, there’s two things involved.  Number one, when they decided they had to get rid of me as Ed Cameron, because of my traveling through time and the time loops involved, they could not kill me, because [of] the Norman Levinson time equations.  One of the people involved in the background of the experiments, Norman Levinson, was a professor at MIT.  He wrote a whole series of books in the open literature, five of them, on mathematics, and some of that work is still classified to this day—The Time Equations and The Time Matrix.  He indicated from his work—the classified portions—that if a rift developed in space-time, in the time field, it would be unstable for a certain period of time and then would start to settle down, and then it would take another twenty years before it actually became fully stable of itself.  In that interim period, there had to be dampening applied to it, or it might become highly unstable again.

For reasons I do not understand, nor does Duncan nor anyone else involved with this, which includes John von Neumann, we are the dampers,* if you will, providing the stability for the time-field to settle down to its normal flow.  How this works I have not any idea whatsoever.  Apparently no electronic equipment could handle it—at least what we know of at this time.

*Damper n. (1) something that deadens, restrains, or depresses, (2) an adjustable plate for controlling a draft, and (3) one that deadens vibrations. Damper‘s corresponding verb is dampen, which means to deaden, restrain, or depress.

The instability resulted because of the rupture of the space-time field between 12 August, 1943, and 12 August, 1983.  One of the other things we didn’t know was why this date, 12 August, was so significant, which I have mentioned earlier in this presentation.  We had the drop-dead date, which was given to John von Neumann, to complete the test by 12 August—this, of course, was 1943—or forget it.  And, the other end of it, 12 August, 1983, the Montauk Project was operating and we wound up there—after we jumped off the ship.  The ship was yanked out into hyperspace.  John von Neumann explained to us that because the two systems were operating on that same date of 12th of August, forty years apart, that they locked up.  There were certain reasons why, and the primary reasons why we did not know at that time, nor did John von Neumann.

In approximately 1986, 1987, after recovering my memories of the Montauk Project and talking extensively and visiting extensively with Preston Nichols, I came up with something which I’m not even sure where the information came from.  But I was aware of the fact that other people, having done research, were quite certain that Earth, like the human body, has its own biorhythms.  The human body has three, and they are easily charted, and they play a role of some significance in our psychological makeup and behavior.

Earth’s four biorhythms peak together every twenty years

Earth has four biorhythms.  And strangely enough, all four only peak out once every twenty years.  Preston Nichols did a lot of research with his battery of radio receivers: he has an antique receiver museum, if you will.  And he cranked them all up, put them between stations at various frequencies, and took a measurement of the noise background.  He found it fluctuated on a periodic basis.  He talked to the people at his office and his boss.  He said, “There may be some significant information here,” and his boss agreed, and gave him a little bit of money to continue the work at home and bring it in to the office, and eventually all of his information was crunched in their main computer, and it came up with the four biorhythms.  Lo and behold, all four peaked out on one day every twenty years.  I don’t think I have to say what day that was—it was the 12th of August, plus or minus half a day—1943, 1963, 1983, 2003—forward and backwards in time every twenty years.

Well, we finally figured out that this had something to do with the fact that the lockup occured on the 12th of August, 1943, with the program at Montauk on 12 August, 1983.  Because on 22 July, there was no such lockup.  There was no evidence of any kind of instability of this type.  And the fact that the records at Montauk show that they turned the station on on 1 August, or approximately 1 August, 1983, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with no letup, was very significant in itself, because it had never happened before in the history of the Montauk operation.  And it was definitely on that night of 12 August, 1983.

Because of the synchronization, I think would be the proper term, due to the biorhythms of Planet Earth, they provided the link—the cross-link, if you will—between 12 August, 1983 and 12 August, 1943. The 1963 point, in that particular instance, didn’t matter, even though it was possible to lock up there, because you were forty years apart for these two programs. They both used similar math, similar technology, and similar field generators: not exactly the same, but some of them. And they were both playing games with time.

So, with that additional synchronization, they locked up to where the Eldridge left the harbor, disappeared into hyperspace—which was possible to create.  The math shows that it can exist, but normally it doesn’t, except there’s a mathematical creation.  But it became a physical creation because of the energies in the Eldridge, and they took the generators and the power systems with them. So, the Eldridge was there in hyperspace generating the field, which became a hyperspace field around the fields of the Eldridge, and held it in that area.

We didn’t understand why this could happen.  I don’t know whether John von Neumann even understood why.  But it did happen.  And, of course, we had to go back to the Eldridge and smash the equipment so the ship would return to 1943, which it did.  The primary reason for this to happen was not anything that we knew about, was not anything which the civilian and government personnel at the station knew anything about, as to what was going to happen or why this was allowed to happen.

I received a letter several months later that would close the case as regards whether or not the Wilson brothers had existed. It was from a man named Amado Crowley, who claimed to be an illegitimate son of Aleister Crowley.  Amado not only stated that his father had talked about the Wilson brothers, but he gave a spectacular account of his father’s whereabouts on August 12, 1943, the day of the Philadelphia Experiment.

On that day, Aleister Crowley had directed a magical ceremony at Men-an-Tol in Cornwall, England. where a large doughnut-shaped rock stands upright.  According to Amado, Aleister put him through the hole in the rock, whereupon a line of rough water ran west toward Long Island, New York. – Peter Moon, Pyramids of Montauk

A seven-foot-tall Draco at Montauk

One has to take another look at the agenda of the alien groups, and the person who was the leader, shall we say, that represented all of the alien operations and the alien interests in Montauk, was a very tall seven-foot Draco.  He was quite haughty, but I did get to talk with him after awhile, and he finally came off his high horse and became sort of friendly.  An exceedingly intelligent individual—we found out from interviews with him that he had twelve degrees equivalent to the doctor’s degree, a doctorate here on Earth and a doctor of science.  As he said, “We have sixteen disciplines we can get a doctorate in—what you call a doctorate degree.”  “How many do you have?”  “Twelve.”  “What are you going to do when you get your other four?”  And he looked at me strangely and he says, “I don’t know.  I haven’t gone back to get the other four.”

In any case, he represented all of the alien agendas.  The alien agenda was approved in advance by the government interests as the price for getting the technology to build this station.  So they set it up so it would operate on the 12th of August, 1983, and produce a rift in space-time 40 years wide, for purposes which we didn’t understand then either, or we didn’t understand for some years after that, even when we were looking at this in the face and asking, What does this really mean?

Standing-waves in the flow of time

We finally figured out in the 1990s that the alien agenda was deliberately designed to produce this rift in space-time, which caused a lot of problems.  And [they] had to have a solution for preventing a major cataclysmic reaction.  During the period of time around 12 August, 1963, we built equipment; or, I should say, Dr. John von Neumann and certain other scientists built equipment in May of 1963 to prevent the backlash from the time-field.  Because it, in a certain sense, is like an electromagnetic transmission line.  In an electromagnetic transmission line, it’s perfectly standard electrical theory: you transmit RF energy down the line from a certain source-impedence.  The transmission-line cable has the same impedence, and you bump it into a load which is of the same characteristic impedence.  You have maximum transfer of power and it’s very smooth.  If you don’t have a matching impedence at the final end, it’s off, then you start to get standing waves: there’s energy reflected back to the source.  And if these are really out of balance, you get very heavy reflections.  A standing-wave ratio is a common thing referred to in RF transmission and RF transmission lines.  You want a standing ratio of one, which means it’s totally damped and stable, and the maximum transmission of power with no reflections.  Anything other than one, you lose power, and it reflects down the line—becomes quite a mess.

The same thing is true of the time field.  If something disrupts the normal function and the flow of time through this field, you can get standing-waves in time.  And this is what happened because of this disruption in 1943.  Of course, after we were past that point, there wasn’t much you could do about the 1943 end, but the 1983 end and the 1963 point had to be damped.  We [Duncan and Al] were the dampers, and according to Levinson’s equations, it takes another 20 years–and that is to the year 2003–before it is fully stable of itself.  I suppose at that point the government could get rid of us if ithey wanted to, unless there are other factors involved.

I suppose at that point (after 2003) the government could get rid of us if ithey wanted to, unless there are other factors involved.

There are a lot of loose ends on this whole project—I should say, projects.  I’m trying to wrap them up and trying to show what happened.  And we’re trying to understand it still ourselves, all of the aspects of it.

Montauk was shut down on 12 August, 1983.  It was rebuilt, re-opened in 1987, and as I’ve stated earlier, of course it became involved in Navy projects—Air Force and then Navy, and is still operational to this day (2000).  There was other work that has been done on time-travel at locations other than Montauk.  I’m not privy to that information other than I do know they exist.

Re-engineering history

There have also been attempts at what could probably best be called re-engineering of history.  Science-fiction, of course, is replete with these stories and with ideas of how to re-engineer history and change the future.  All I can state is, my information is that this has been done, and we would not, of course, be aware if it was successful.  The only way you would possibly be aware of it is if some of us, a group, were off-planet, far enough away to watch and record the change in history from a distant point, and suddenly everything changed.  Because if you re-engineer history by changing the past, the present, so to speak, and the future will be altered.  And since it has been changed completely, no one is going to remember that it ever happened.  This is one of the strange facts about it.  And, of course, the textbooks change; everything changes physically.

This raises a question: how real is this reality?  We write books, we make monuments, we carve in the stone and this sort of thing.  If we can re-engineer history by going back into the past and changing some major element, does all of this change?  And if it does, then how real is our reality?

Lost children

It’s an interesting point, and I think I will leave it at that, except for one other item: not the Bielek family of my parents, but the Bielek family of mine. When I married in 1943, of course there was a son due; we didn’t know at that point if it was going to be a son or daughter, but in February of 1944, a son was born—Jeff Cameron. And as time went on, there were other kids. I’ll have to say honestly that Jeff Cameron was a legitimate son, number-one, and the rest of the kiddies that came along were not exactly legitimate. Being in the Navy, and as the Navy had me traveling in the period when I was at Los Alamos, and that’s all over the state and all over other locations, and I had a problem like my father: that girls wouldn’t leave me alone and I couldn’t say no. So, like my father, there were a few additional children around. And I’ve only been able to track down number-two and number-three. Number-two I’ve seen personally, a man by the name of Morgan. Number three, at this point I’m quite sure, David. Number four I do not know where he is, first name of John. Number-five may be a daughter, but I have no data whatever on that.

This is an ongoing pursuit at this point to find out where they all went, what’s happened to them. And even though there have been many attempts on my part to meet with Jeff, they have all been thwarted. And I do have a picture of him and I’m going to put this up and show it, because I want this as part of the document. And this picture was taken at the time when he was age twenty, as part of a New Mexico State Fair contest—probably 4-H. This is a blow-up from the original photo. The last time I saw him was actually about 1952 with the family, and of course, at that point he was eight years old. In this picture he is about twenty. Today he’s fifty-four, fifty-five. I have not seen him since that time in 1952. In spite of the ten years of attempts, they’ve all been deliberately thwarted by powers unknown. And today, to the best of my knowledge he’s under the protection of the military because a contract was put out on his life in excess of $10 million. Somebody wanted him dead. That occurred in 1998.

From that point on, I guess there’s not much more I can say about my family; I’m still trying to find them. It’s a little late, but better late than never.

I will close here, except that I will do an epilogue, and a few other points will be raised in that.